![]() |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
An Alternate Theory of | The Historical Integrity of Eusebius of Caesarea
| Web Publication by Mountain Man Graphics, Australia
![]() | ||||

Introduction |
|---|
This Eusebian Fiction Postulate is deemed reasonable on the basis of an agglomerated series of opinions concerning Eusebius. This list of quotations is by no means complete, but should for the moment serve to substantiate the need to invoke the postulate.
Essentially the following compendium of opinion should be used to establish a rough gauge upon the measure, and the tolerance, of historical integrity in the historical literature authored by Eusebius.
I am always interested in expanding this list with relevant quotations, and electronic messages may be sent to Arius at the domain name of this site.
PRF Brown
EDITOR
MOUNTAIN MAN GRAPHICS

Quotes upon Eusebian Integrity |
|---|
‘Truth, O Stranger, is a noble and an enduring thing;
it seems, however, not easy to persuade men of it.’
--- Gibbon
--- Gibbon
The most bitter of his theological adversaries
were forced to confess their obligations to him,
and to speak of his work with respect.
It is only necessary to reflect for a moment
what a blank would be left in our knowledge
of this most important chapter in all human history,
if the narrative of Eusebius were blotted out,
and we shall appreciate the enormous debt
of gratitude which we owe to him.
The little light which glimmered over the earliest
history of Christianity in medieval times
came ultimately from Eusebius alone,
coloured and distorted in its passage
through various media.
...[and]...
"not until the mass of inventions
labelled 'Eusebius' shall be exposed,
can the pretended references to Christians
in Pagan writers of the first three centuries
be recognized for the forgeries they are."
Though it has in it nothing divine,
by making full use of that part of the soul
which loves fable and is childish and foolish,
it has induced men to believe
that the monstrous tale is truth."
...[and, a little later ..]...
"The wretched Eusebius will have it
that poems in hexameters are to be found even among them,
and sets up a claim that the study of logic exists among the Hebrews,
since he has heard among the Hellenes the word they use for logic."
[1] Erik Peterson, Der Monotheismus als politisches
Problem (Munich, 1951 ), p. 91;
[2] Henri Grégoire, "L'authenticité et l'historicité de la Vita
Constantini attribuée ê Eusèbe de Césarée," Bulletin de l'Académie
Royale de Belgique, Classe des Lettres, 39 ( 1953 ): 462-479,
quoted in T. D. Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius (Cambridge,
Mass., 1981 ), p. 401;
[3] Arnaldo Momigliano, "Pagan and Christian Historiography in the Fourth
Century," in The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth
Century, ed. A. Momigliano (Oxford, 1963 ), p. 85;
[4] Robert Markus, "The Roman Empire in Early Christian Historiography,"
The Downside Review 81 ( 1963 ): 343;
[5] Charles N. Cochrane, Christianity and Classical Culture (1940; reprint,
Oxford, 1966 ), p. 183;
[6] Hendrik Berkhof, Die Theologie des Eusebius von Caesarea
(Amsterdam, 1939 ), pp. 21-22;
[7] Hans Eger, "Kaiser und Kirche in der Geschichtstheologie Eusebs von Cäsarea",
Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 38 ( 1939 ): 115;
[8] Per Beskow, Rex Gloriae. The Kingship of Christ in the Early Church
(Uppsala, 1962 ), p. 318;
[9] J. M. Sansterre, "Eusèbe de Césarée et la naissance de la théorie 'césaropapiste,'"
Byzantion 42 ( 1972 ): 593
It is obvious that these are not, in the main, neutral descriptions. Much traditional scholarship, sometimes with barely sup- pressed disdain, has regarded Eusebius as one who risked his orthodoxy and perhaps his character because of his zeal for the Constantinian establishment. Scholars have often observed, for example, that his literary works in defense of the new order depict Constantine and his reign in eschatological terms that rival and even supplant the Incarnation and Parousia in salvation history.
To be sure, this assessment relies on abundant documentation: in the Life of Constantine and in the Tricennial Oration, delivered on the thirtieth anniversary of Constantine's reign, as well as in other books, Eusebius gave an enthusiastic Christian endorsement
.
Religion and Politics in the Writings of Eusebius:
Reassessing the First "Court Theologian"
--- MICHAEL J. HOLLERICH
Assistant professor of religious studies
in Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California.
The first Christian scholar to engage in researching and writing a complete history of the Christian church, Eusebius of Caesarea, reveals the embarrassing complexity of the development of the Christian canon, despite his concerted attempt to cover this with a pro-orthodox account.
Two things must be known:
first, Eusebius was either a liar or hopelessly credulous
(see note. 6), and either way not a very good historian;
second, Eusebius rewrote his History of the Church at least five times
(cf. M 202, n. 29), in order to accommodate changing events, including
the ever-important Council of Nicea ...
Richard Carrier: The Formation of the New Testament Canon
